RSS Feed

Trust beneficiary's ability to move into the rental property remains up in the air

Friday, August 28, 2020

A common question that has been circulating in the lead-up to the Residential Tenancies Amendment Act 2020 coming into effect:

Whether a tenancy at a trust-owned rental property can be terminated under s 51(1)(a)?

The current s51(1)(a) requires the landlord to give a 42-day notice to terminate if the owner or any member of the owners' family intend to move into the property as a principal place of residence. The amended section increases the notice period to 63 days and requires that the owner/member of the owners' family move into the property within 90 days of termination and uses it as the principal place of residence for at least 90 days.

(Two things to note: The section owners not landlords*. The Amendment broadens the definition for 'member of the landlord's or owner's family'. )

As many rental properties are held by companies or trusts for asset protection and tax purposes, the natural inquiry then is whether tenancies of company-owned or trust-owned properties are capable of being terminated under s51(1)(a). 

In the case of company-owned properties, the answer is fairly straight forward. A company is a standalone entity that is separate and distinct from its directors and shareholders. It is incapable of having family members. Tenancies at company-owned properties cannot be terminated under s51(1)(a). 

The same logic does not apply comfortably to trust-owned properties. On a strict interpretation, a trust is a 'bundle of rights'; rights and bundles are incapable of having family members so s51(1)(a) should have no place in a trust-owned tenancy. But what about trustees who are beneficiaries and their family members who are also beneficiaries of the trust? The right answer becomes a lot less clear. 

To complicate the matter more, the Tenancy Tribunal has been inconsistent in its approach. 

In Kearns, Heather v Jazmine Lenniston as trustees for the J T Trust [2018] NZTT Porirua 4139127, the adjudicator held that

... the person seeking to occupy the premises in this case is a trustee – and presumably also a beneficiary... As a trustee, Ms Lenniston is legally (if not beneficially) an owner of the property: her name will appear on the title to the property. On that basis, I am prepared to find that s.51(1)(a) can apply.

Yet the adjudicator in Fitzpatrick, Natasha Sandra and other parties v Trustees Executors Ltd [2018] NZTT Manukau 4125809 is adamant that 

There is no ability for a company or trust to give notice pursuant to section 51(1)(a) to terminate a tenancy, as a trust or a company cannot occupy the premises as its principal place of residence, and neither can they have family members who could occupy the premises.

DK Law Director Kristine King says, 'If the Tribunal is to focus on the beneficiaries then there is a pathway to have those people considered as family members for the purposes of the section. Especially with the new Trust Act coming in, we are seeing variations of trust so that the trust beneficiaries are reduced to core family members and elimination of wider general classes of beneficiaries due to the new disclosure requirements. That would align quite well with these provisions. This, however, wouldn't work for trusts where the only beneficiary is another trust (e.g. a trading trust with a family trust as sole beneficiary).'

As with many interpretation issues, we look to the Tenancy Tribunal as the ultimate arbiter and await more orders to eventuate before advising our members further. What we do know for certain is that the RTAA 2020 has not all of a sudden, put up an impediment for company directors, shareholders and trust beneficiaries to avail themselves of the protection of s51(1)(a). But the removal of the safety net that is 90-day no-fault termination certainly amplifies the urgency for property investors to consider, more broadly, the knock-on effects of different ownership instruments. Sign up to our upcoming webinar to learn the best way to structure your rental property portfolio.

We would like to acknowledge Kristine King and the team at DK Law for assisting us with putting this piece together. 

* Had s51(1)(a) allow for termination to take place to accommodate the landlord and landlord's family moving in then an argument could be made characterising the director of a company and settlor/trustee of the trust as landlords and therefore make way for the termination to occur.





Recent Posts


subdivision insurance warm up new zealand RBNZ tenancy services landlord DTI property winz market p lab inspection education business meth contamination shower dome Market report CCC barfoot and thompson rental market Investor story bad tenant income Tribunal case study property maintenance lvr rent Q&A recycling equity renovation debt enforcement positive cash flow first home buying rta reform ring-fencing termination development election2020 clnz trust tax rental wof heating LIM Holler tenancy tribunal HSWA bond RTAA 2019 trademe meth Level 4 Standards New Zealand cat Kris Pedersen Mortgages and Insurance trespass kiwibuild financial advisers act TCIT capital gain Editor's Choice scotney williams television interest only buying rules return beginner investor negotiation ocr property cycle khh property management principal and interest wealth creation housing affordability investor Investment tip short-term rental market rent maintenance minor dwelling Guest blog twg report productivity CoreLogic gluckman report smoke alarm HHS relationship mortgage anz property apprentice parry v inglis skill shortage equity letting buying HHGA Must know yield tenant sale and purchas worksafe interest rates holiday house extractor fan nzpif finance heater water bill unitary plan ird ask an expert tenancy issues asbestos rtaa2020 watercare bond form auckland council covid-19 structure sale and purchase initio rta Landlording Must knows Question and answer mindset cgt airbnb management legal data security cash-flow buyer's agent robert kiyosaki building housing bubble Gluckman off the plan investment strategy government partners personal growth fixed-term tenancy damage rent increase property value advice reserve bank will How to insulation Property (Relationships) Act sublease boarding house privacy speculator Sponsored post opes partners house prices letting fee warren buffett rent arrears commerce commission auckland election 2017 wins Jeff Bezos banking Case study ventilation


Introducing Our Partners
Principal Sponsor - Kris Pedersen Mortgages & Insurance logo Gold Sponsor - Barfoot & Thompson logo Gold Sponsor - CoreLogic logo Property Apprentice logo The Insulation Warehouse logo The Renovation Team logo The New Zealand Property Investors' Federation logo
09 360 2376

The Tenancy Practice Service and TPS Credit Control work closely with the Auckland Property Investors' Association. Our vision of bringing helpful resources, documents and high quality services to Auckland Property Investors and Property Managers is shared by APIA, so its a partnership that works well. 

The Auckland Property Investors' Association is a great organisation for those who want access to advice and information from a range of industry experts and partners. 

Mathieu Holt- Managing Director, The Tenancy Practice Service & TPS Credit Control
Through the Association I found the channels and methods to fund the purchase of property I never dreamed about. Grant Brown

All round it has been one of those things Neil and I felt was really worthwhile belonging to. We have learned so much it has just built our confidence in what we are doing.

Janice Bieleski
I read two articles in the monthly magazine that saved me over $5,000. That is my membership fee for the next 26 years and I am sure I will learn a whole lot more! John Duncan
Fantastic organisation. The networking opportunities are brilliant and provide us with information and opportunities that cannot be obtained anywhere else. We learn something new at every meeting and we've been in this game for nearly 20 years. Pauline and Gyanen Kumar

I find the information obtained from various APIA meetings very useful in guiding my own property investment and rental management.  I also enjoy the networking opportunities with like-minded investors.  I am inspired by other investors’ success and find the more experiences and knowledge that I share with others, the more confident I become.  

Thanks to all APIA event organizers and administrators for your brilliant work. 

Stella Shao

I like talking to people and learning from their experience because it gives me the confidence to invest well. I think it is a knowledge thing. I now know I am doing things the right way.

Stephen Weatherall

My APIA membership has become a total success.

Every time I attend a monthly or regional meeting I come away with so many useful and positive tips that have added value to my property investments and management.

Not only that, the website is a great place for practical advice and useful information. It has now evolved into an important resource for my business.

Talk about value for money! The discounts I have been getting at Bunnings when I present my APIA membership card have more than paid for my annual subscription!

Tim Duffett, Plan A Investments Limited