RSS Feed

Rent increase after substantial work: not a case of $1-in-$1-out

Wednesday, December 09, 2020

From time to time, investors almost flippantly assume that any expenses incurred improving the property can be directly recouped from the tenant by way of rent increase on a $1-in-$1-out basis. Monarch Realty Ltd v Alchin-Boller [2020] NZTT Hamilton 4277248 is a reminder that this is not the case. At least not quite. 


  • The landlord sought the tenant’s consent to increase the rent from $255 to $320 (>25%) after spending $14,000 upgrading the property to provide:
    • replacement stove
    • new kitchen cabinets and larger splashback
    • replacement kitchen venting fan (original rangehood had no external vent)
    • repaint kitchen
    • install bathroom extractor fan (no existing fan)
    • install heat pump in living area (no existing heating)

  • It is the landlord’s view that the work had increased the value and benefit to the tenant making it eligible for an s28(1)(a) increase; 
  • The tenant consented to the work but did not consent to the increase; and
  • The landlord applied to the Tribunal under s28(2) for an order to increase rent to $320 per week. 
The law

s28(1)(a) sets out the parameters within which parties can agree to a rent increase after substantial improvements have been made to the property. The subsection states:

(1) The landlord and the tenant may agree to increase the rent if the landlord has, with the consent of the tenant,—

(a) made substantial improvements to the premises (not being general or necessary repairs) that increase the value of the premises and constitute a material benefit to the tenant

The adjudicator notes the following salient features: 

  • substantial improvements are not the same as general or necessary repairs;
  • the tenant must consent to the work (note that this is not the same as consenting to the subsequent rent increase);
  • the cost of the improvement on the landlord ($14,000 in this instance) is not the same as the increase in value/material benefit to the tenant. 

The adjudicator further considers HHS deadlines (July 2021/July 2024) and whether some of the work would be general or necessary repair rather than substantial improvements. The adjudicator gives some weigh to early compliance insofar as not arriving at a decision that would discourage early compliance.


The adjudicator considers the work as follows: 

  • New kitchen venting fan = necessary repair 
    • because the original rangehood could not be vented externally
  • Bathroom extractor fan = substantial improvement 
    • due to early HHS compliance
  • Heat pump = necessary work
    • while it could be seen as an early HHS compliance, the fact that there was previously no heat source means the landlord fell short at meeting the Housing Improvement Regulations of 1947 which is an existing standard for heating at rental properties;
  • New stove, cabinet and splashback = substantial improvements 
    • as the work was not required.  

The adjudicator rejects the notion that the cost of work directly translates to an increase in value for the tenant but in the interest of fairness found that it was more probable than not that the bathroom fan, kitchen cabinetry, stove and splashback did increase the rental value of the property.

In saying that, the adjudicator disagrees with the amount of proposed increase. Simply put, the level value improvement to be had by the tenant in this instance is less than the >25% rent increase proposed by the landlord.


The Tribunal ordered the rent to be increased to $275 from $255 rather than the $320 the landlord had originally proposed (i.e. <8% increase instead of >25% increase).


Take-home for landlords
  • In determining the increase in rental value to the tenant, the Tribunal will likely require comparable rental valuations of the actual property before and after substantial works. Rental valuation reports of other comparable properties will not be persuasive; 
  • A 25% increase in rent is more than modest
  • Though not explicitly stated by s28, the level of increase should reflect the level of improvements. In short, modest improvements warrant only moderate increases.
Overall helpfulness scale (Because let's be honest, Tribunal decisions can be a bit of a mess but still, landlords and tenants need all the help we can get!)

⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️


Recent Posts


termination watercare HHGA rent increase parry v inglis early termination heating Must know reserve bank mindset Q&A interest rates subdivision brightline extractor fan property short-term rental Investment tip landlord speculator unitary plan rental wof rent arrears smoke alarm LIM anti-social behaviour TCIT lvr financial advisers act income HHS covid-19 worksafe commerce commission anz off the plan government trademe data security ask an expert mortgage rental market re agent meth contamination Case study Jeff Bezos robert kiyosaki election2020 CoreLogic property value winz wealth creation house prices shower dome finance tenancy tribunal p lab Guest blog rta fixed-term tenancy management Holler structure election 2017 tenant sale and purchas twg report privacy ird investment strategy buyer's agent clnz RTAA 2019 ocr development debt enforcement letting personal growth advice Landlording holiday house meth legal damage positive cash flow apia buying Investor story warren buffett rtaa2020 bond form television khh market Must knows retaliatory notice building Market report Standards New Zealand productivity investor boarding house asbestos partners heater buying rules housing bubble wins ventilation will CCC Sponsored post maintenance shortland chartered accountants auckland council recycling equity opes partners quiet enjoyment negotiation beginner investor sale and purchase equity tenancy services warm up new zealand kiwibuild insulation sublease yield Question and answer tenancy issues gluckman report bankruptcy business cgt DTI principal and interest relationship market rent rent property management education Level 4 housing affordability Tribunal case study trust property cycle trespass cash-flow minor dwelling bond letting fee inspection rta reform water bill property maintenance How to barfoot and thompson interest only Gluckman initio skill shortage property apprentice ring-fencing bad tenant tax RBNZ insurance cat scotney williams airbnb first home buying banking Editor's Choice nzpif auckland HSWA renovation return Kris Pedersen Mortgages and Insurance Property (Relationships) Act capital gain


Introducing Our Partners
Principal Sponsor - Kris Pedersen Mortgages & Insurance logo Gold Sponsor - Barfoot & Thompson logo Gold Sponsor - CoreLogic logo Property Apprentice logo The Insulation Warehouse logo The Renovation Team logo The New Zealand Property Investors' Federation logo
09 360 2376

The Tenancy Practice Service and TPS Credit Control work closely with the Auckland Property Investors' Association. Our vision of bringing helpful resources, documents and high quality services to Auckland Property Investors and Property Managers is shared by APIA, so its a partnership that works well. 

The Auckland Property Investors' Association is a great organisation for those who want access to advice and information from a range of industry experts and partners. 

Mathieu Holt- Managing Director, The Tenancy Practice Service & TPS Credit Control
Through the Association I found the channels and methods to fund the purchase of property I never dreamed about. Grant Brown

All round it has been one of those things Neil and I felt was really worthwhile belonging to. We have learned so much it has just built our confidence in what we are doing.

Janice Bieleski
I read two articles in the monthly magazine that saved me over $5,000. That is my membership fee for the next 26 years and I am sure I will learn a whole lot more! John Duncan
Fantastic organisation. The networking opportunities are brilliant and provide us with information and opportunities that cannot be obtained anywhere else. We learn something new at every meeting and we've been in this game for nearly 20 years. Pauline and Gyanen Kumar

I find the information obtained from various APIA meetings very useful in guiding my own property investment and rental management.  I also enjoy the networking opportunities with like-minded investors.  I am inspired by other investors’ success and find the more experiences and knowledge that I share with others, the more confident I become.  

Thanks to all APIA event organizers and administrators for your brilliant work. 

Stella Shao

I like talking to people and learning from their experience because it gives me the confidence to invest well. I think it is a knowledge thing. I now know I am doing things the right way.

Stephen Weatherall

My APIA membership has become a total success.

Every time I attend a monthly or regional meeting I come away with so many useful and positive tips that have added value to my property investments and management.

Not only that, the website is a great place for practical advice and useful information. It has now evolved into an important resource for my business.

Talk about value for money! The discounts I have been getting at Bunnings when I present my APIA membership card have more than paid for my annual subscription!

Tim Duffett, Plan A Investments Limited