APIA Blog

RSS Feed

Peter Lewis: What can you deduct?

Wednesday, April 03, 2019

 

IMG CREDIT: UNSPLASH

 

Given the ongoing publicity and often heated discussions, all landlords should by now know that there are a number of mandatory upgrades and enhancements that will be required for all residential rental properties over the next few years.

We have already passed the date when it became compulsory to install smoke alarms in all such properties, and we are very near the time the first part of the insulation installation requirements will be enforced. On the 1st July, unless your property can be shown to fall into one of the exemption categories, your rental will require ceiling and underfloor insulation to either the 1978 standard or the 2008 standard.

Then, over the next few years, we will be required to upgrade our rentals further to the Healthy Homes standards. These stipulate, among other items, insulation to the 2008 standard, the supply of heating appliances, underfloor moisture barriers and compulsory extractor fans. While a considerable number of residential properties will now never come onto the rental market in the first place and others will be placed into the ‘too hard’ basket, the tenants told to leave, and the property sold, most of the remaining rental properties will require work that will cost actual cash money – substantial money in quite a few cases. Despite the sweeping assertions of ‘free’ in many of the current Government’s pronouncements, very little in this life is actually free.

There has been much uninformed drivel written about the actual costs of all this work. Some say “So extractor fans are dirt cheap, all you need for the moisture barrier is a couple of rolls of polyurethane, and how much are heaters these days?” This of course, completely ignore two vital components of the work – the often costly implications of retro fitting electrical appliances into an existing, possibly dated, power system and the labour component of the work involved. Right now, I’m getting the outside of a standard 1960s weatherboard house professionally painted, and I can assure you that the cost of doing that is many, many thousands of dollars more than the price of a few tins of paint.

We now enter into the murky waters of the tax deductibility for such work. The rules around the deductibility of residential rental property expenses are, in theory, quite simple. The condition of the property on the day you acquired it established the benchmark. Any subsequent expenditure incurred in getting the property back to that condition is a legitimate tax-deductible expense but any spending on improving the property beyond the condition it was on that day is classed as capital improvements and therefore non-deductible.

When you buy a property where the roof is in sound condition and then years down the track it rusts, leaks and needs replacing, providing that you replace that roof with a similar new one then, no argument, that is a deductible expense. You are now back to where you were on day one. However, if the roof was bad when you bought the place and you splash out on a new roof so your tenants can enjoy the good life then that is clearly betterment. The logic is that you got the property a bit cheaper because of the roof, you have now improved it beyond the condition of it on day one, it is now worth more, so sorry no tax deductibility.

Seems simple. But, in many cases confusion reigns. If a component of the property deteriorates and needs replacing but you decide to upgrade your replacement the tax-man can become quite unfriendly. Last week I heard of a landlord who needed to replace the existing windows in an investment property. In itself, quite deductible. However, he was attracted by the idea of moving to double glazing rather than replacing like with like. This would cost $5000 more. Could he claim the quoted costs of the like-for-like replacement as a deductible expense, and treat the extra $5000 was capital expenditure. No, he was told. If he double glazed, the entire cost would be capital and there would be no tax deduction at all. Zilch. I’m sure that this ruling would have greatly influenced his final decision.

One available option, faced with the often substantial costs of upgrading a rental property to meet the new standards, is simply not to rent it out. Or, to turn the logic on its head, to keep the property running as an income-earning business you, as the owner, will be required by the new legislation to carry out and pay for these upgrades. I have seen a number of queries along the lines of “Surely if I am compelled to spend this money in order to continue my rental business, I should be able to treat that unavoidable and mandatory cost as a deductible expense?”

The bad news is that it does not work that way. The IRD’s interpretation of the tax law remains that if you improve the insulation, pay for the extractor fans and the heating, then regardless of the reason that is improvement and, therefore, attracts no deductibility. In law they are actually quite correct in saying that. The Property Investors Federation has made representation to the Government that there should be some tax allowance for the cost of this work but received a very fast and firm rebuff. Sure, you may be able to claim depreciation on some of these items over time, but the full cash impact is right now.

Given that one of the publicly stated aims of all this legislation is to reduce costs to the public purse within both the health system and the education system with “ . . . fewer hospital admissions and fewer school days lost” it would seem to be fair to do this. However, the current refusal to do so means that effectively private landlords are directly funding the costs of implementing these public sector savings. Actually, we are paying twice, as the price of every item of insulation, every roll of polythene and every hour of paid labour to install these upgrades incurs GST, which then also goes directly into the Government coffers.

A case of we lose, and the Government wins twice.

This is a guest blog submission from APIA member Peter Lewis. Guest submissions are a way for APIA members to share their views and experiences with each other and do not necessarily reflect the views and position of the APIA.


ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Peter Lewis

Peter is the Vice President of both the Auckland Property Investors' Association and the New Zealand Property Investors' Federation. He is not an accountant. This article does not purport to be that of a tax advice. 


 

Recent Posts


Tags

asbestos minor dwelling gluckman report tenant investment strategy cat nzpif rental market buying ring-fencing ventilation Landlording sale and purchas Question and answer property cycle water bill rental wof tax personal growth Holler smoke alarm government reserve bank scotney williams property maintenance negotiation productivity cgt shower dome sublease Investment tip maintenance housing bubble Guest blog trespass rent increase Standards New Zealand Jeff Bezos fixed-term tenancy CCC ask an expert sale and purchase robert kiyosaki insulation capital gain letting fee insurance inspection interest only ird letting extractor fan Must know legal property management Editor's Choice How to equity meth contamination lvr clnz first home buying financial advisers act watercare p lab speculator mortgage wins finance warm up new zealand Tribunal case study Investor story property value development structure HHS bond form parry v inglis heater CoreLogic advice ocr banking winz positive cash flow Property (Relationships) Act renovation bad tenant wealth creation initio HSWA Market report buyer's agent bond damage rta reform tenancy tribunal boarding house relationship house prices buying rules debt enforcement principal and interest income rent arrears short-term rental HHGA tenancy services twg report return data security skill shortage LIM election 2017 warren buffett property Sponsored post Q&A Kris Pedersen Mortgages and Insurance DTI auckland council market TCIT privacy building market rent airbnb subdivision Must knows off the plan housing affordability beginner investor tenancy issues cash-flow trust investor unitary plan landlord auckland education management interest rates rta partners heating rent holiday house worksafe anz business trademe television

Archive

Introducing Our Partners
Principal Sponsor - Kris Pedersen Mortgages & Insurance logo Gold Sponsor - Barfoot & Thompson logo Gold Sponsor - CoreLogic logo Keith Hay Homes logo The Insulation Warehouse logo The Renovation Team logo The New Zealand Property Investors' Federation logo
09 360 2376
info@apia.org.nz

The Tenancy Practice Service and TPS Credit Control work closely with the Auckland Property Investors' Association. Our vision of bringing helpful resources, documents and high quality services to Auckland Property Investors and Property Managers is shared by APIA, so its a partnership that works well. 

The Auckland Property Investors' Association is a great organisation for those who want access to advice and information from a range of industry experts and partners. 



Mathieu Holt- Managing Director, The Tenancy Practice Service & TPS Credit Control
Through the Association I found the channels and methods to fund the purchase of property I never dreamed about. Grant Brown

All round it has been one of those things Neil and I felt was really worthwhile belonging to. We have learned so much it has just built our confidence in what we are doing.

Janice Bieleski
I read two articles in the monthly magazine that saved me over $5,000. That is my membership fee for the next 26 years and I am sure I will learn a whole lot more! John Duncan
Fantastic organisation. The networking opportunities are brilliant and provide us with information and opportunities that cannot be obtained anywhere else. We learn something new at every meeting and we've been in this game for nearly 20 years. Pauline and Gyanen Kumar

I find the information obtained from various APIA meetings very useful in guiding my own property investment and rental management.  I also enjoy the networking opportunities with like-minded investors.  I am inspired by other investors’ success and find the more experiences and knowledge that I share with others, the more confident I become.  

Thanks to all APIA event organizers and administrators for your brilliant work. 

Stella Shao

I like talking to people and learning from their experience because it gives me the confidence to invest well. I think it is a knowledge thing. I now know I am doing things the right way.

Stephen Weatherall

My APIA membership has become a total success.

Every time I attend a monthly or regional meeting I come away with so many useful and positive tips that have added value to my property investments and management.

Not only that, the website is a great place for practical advice and useful information. It has now evolved into an important resource for my business.

Talk about value for money! The discounts I have been getting at Bunnings when I present my APIA membership card have more than paid for my annual subscription!

Tim Duffett, Plan A Investments Limited