RSS Feed

Peter Lewis: On tenancy disputes

Monday, October 07, 2019


Tenant advocates frequently claim that private-sector residential tenants are powerless pawns in the hands of greedy and uncaring landlords. They claim that when a tenant makes a request for their landlord to fix something on the property that they are entitled to have fixed, the landlord either ignores them or terminates the tenancy in retaliation. Some tenants have highlighted their plight through the media, creating a victim mentality among many others. As the rental shortage increases, our industry has come under intense scrutiny from those in the media as they lap up stories from tenant advocate groups and individual tenants who are trying to make a name for themselves. Journalists constantly seek news stories and search through Tenancy Tribunal orders, looking for shock-horror stories which lead to more and more tenants being portrayed as victims of an unfair system.

These claims exist, I believe, because of the widespread ignorance of actual tenancy law and the relative powers of both landlord and tenant. As part of my involvement with the Citizens Advice Bureau, I present talks on renting to groups of tenants and also to CAB volunteers, and when I discuss the steps of the dispute resolution process I invariably encounter blank astonishment. Few have heard of the correct dispute settlement process, and even fewer realise that it applies to the disputes tenants may have with landlords as well as disputes landlords have with tenants.

All residential tenancies within New Zealand are governed by the Residential Tenancies Act, and this Act applies to all residential letting with very few exceptions. The Act has been in existence since 1986, and neither landlords nor tenants are able to contract out of this Act.

Within this Act, there is laid out a specific and workable sequence for the resolution of tenancy disputes.

Obviously, the first step in any resolution would be to contact the other party to discuss the problem. This may solve the issue quickly without any further action being required.

If there is no acceptable outcome then the tenant, rather than just grumbling and complaining, should serve a 14-Day Notice on the landlord. The 14-Day Notice is a legal notice to comply, and a tenant can issue a 14-Day Notice to the landlord or property manager if they think that these people are not keeping their obligations under either the Act or the Tenancy Agreement. This Notice is a legal demand and is an essential step in the process, yet I have found that very few tenants are aware of its existence. There is a template for the 14-Day Notice on the Tenancy Services website.

There is an important distinction between the owner of the rental property and the landlord. For self-managing landlords, the owners and the landlord will be the same individual. However, where the owner of the property passes the selection of the tenants, the signing of the Tenancy Agreement and the day-to-day management of the property, the landlord may well be the property manager. It is important that the 14-Day notice is delivered to the correct person. Where the property owner lives out of the country or is away for more than 21 days they are required to appoint someone who is resident as their manager of that property, and the tenant must be advised of this.

If the landlord does not comply within that 14 day time then the tenant can move on to a claim at the Tenancy Tribunal.

The Tenancy Tribunal is a specialist court that can award compensation or order repairs up to a value of $50,000. It’s faster than going to a normal court. It’s also a lot cheaper – the application fee is $20.44

The Order that is issued may include the requirement to repair, maintain or upgrade the rental property, and possibly a money order that requires the landlord to pay restitution or damages.

When I lay out this sequence in front of tenants I normally get one of two reactions. Either they say “If I do that the landlord will evict me” or “If I demand this then the landlord will put the rent up”.

However, it is an unlawful act for a landlord to end a tenancy in retaliation for a tenant exercising a right under the tenancy agreement, the relevant law, or by making a complaint relating to the tenancy. This is called a ‘retaliatory notice’ under the Residential Tenancies Act. Tenants who take direct action against landlords are able to challenge an alleged retaliatory notice up to 28 working days after it has been issued. On the tenant’s application, the Tribunal can overturn a landlord’s notice to end a tenancy if they believe that the landlord gave the notice as a consequence of actions taken by the tenant in exercising their rights. Thus there is no reason for a tenant to fear termination of the tenancy when asking the landlord for the property to be maintained in good condition.

In many cases that I see, the tenant admits that they are paying rent well below market levels. In this case, their fear that improvements to the property will result in a rent increase may be well-founded. However, if they decide not to pursue their claim on these grounds, what they are really saying is “I’d sooner have cheap and nasty rather than good at a reasonable cost”. That may be their choice, but then they actually have no grounds for complaint. By paying cheap they get cheap.

Thus when we hear calls for strengthening the laws around tenancy issues and for imposing increasingly draconian requirements on landlords, perhaps the real question we should be asking is “How do we educate our tenants about the powers they already have and how to use them?” It is pointless bringing in more draconian and tenant-friendly legislation when the existing laws are actually fit for purpose.

I have personally presented talks to several tenant migrant groups covering these topics, and there are some established presentations like the ‘Ready to Rent’ programmes run in Hawkes Bay, but the time and resources employed in discussing proposed strengthening of the legislation may well be more usefully spent on tenant education.


This is a guest blog submission from APIA member Peter Lewis. Guest submissions are a way for APIA members to share their views and experiences with each other and do not necessarily reflect the views and position of the APIA.



Peter Lewis

Peter is the Vice President of both the Auckland Property Investors' Association and the New Zealand Property Investors' Federation. He is not an accountant. 


Recent Posts


ocr property letting Level 4 Question and answer boarding house heating investment strategy initio structure smoke alarm ventilation tenancy issues Jeff Bezos bond form data security termination return rent arrears short-term rental banking How to winz ask an expert ird capital gain rent auckland council khh HSWA nzpif barfoot and thompson house prices Standards New Zealand LIM market rent trespass Landlording Guest blog recycling equity anz speculator management landlord beginner investor covid-19 twg report bond CoreLogic meth contamination Tribunal case study letting fee bad tenant principal and interest Market report tenancy tribunal housing bubble yield asbestos Kris Pedersen Mortgages and Insurance government auckland unitary plan water bill heater cgt worksafe interest only renovation productivity privacy debt enforcement scotney williams RBNZ minor dwelling damage wins CCC buyer's agent rental market interest rates buying rules election2020 first home buying legal ring-fencing cat Property (Relationships) Act election 2017 trademe fixed-term tenancy rta subdivision Investment tip gluckman report clnz cash-flow off the plan negotiation trust buying investor insulation equity lvr rental wof Must know Sponsored post Q&A warm up new zealand Editor's Choice maintenance partners Investor story finance building opes partners mortgage positive cash flow sale and purchas rta reform tenancy services meth development RTAA 2019 television business housing affordability warren buffett personal growth TCIT wealth creation robert kiyosaki holiday house tax DTI skill shortage airbnb financial advisers act property management market income Case study reserve bank p lab Must knows HHS advice insurance property maintenance mindset shower dome watercare education Gluckman tenant property cycle property value relationship sale and purchase extractor fan sublease parry v inglis rent increase inspection Holler HHGA


Introducing Our Partners
Principal Sponsor - Kris Pedersen Mortgages & Insurance logo Gold Sponsor - Barfoot & Thompson logo Gold Sponsor - CoreLogic logo Property Apprentice logo Keith Hay Homes logo The Insulation Warehouse logo The Renovation Team logo The New Zealand Property Investors' Federation logo
09 360 2376

The Tenancy Practice Service and TPS Credit Control work closely with the Auckland Property Investors' Association. Our vision of bringing helpful resources, documents and high quality services to Auckland Property Investors and Property Managers is shared by APIA, so its a partnership that works well. 

The Auckland Property Investors' Association is a great organisation for those who want access to advice and information from a range of industry experts and partners. 

Mathieu Holt- Managing Director, The Tenancy Practice Service & TPS Credit Control
Through the Association I found the channels and methods to fund the purchase of property I never dreamed about. Grant Brown

All round it has been one of those things Neil and I felt was really worthwhile belonging to. We have learned so much it has just built our confidence in what we are doing.

Janice Bieleski
I read two articles in the monthly magazine that saved me over $5,000. That is my membership fee for the next 26 years and I am sure I will learn a whole lot more! John Duncan
Fantastic organisation. The networking opportunities are brilliant and provide us with information and opportunities that cannot be obtained anywhere else. We learn something new at every meeting and we've been in this game for nearly 20 years. Pauline and Gyanen Kumar

I find the information obtained from various APIA meetings very useful in guiding my own property investment and rental management.  I also enjoy the networking opportunities with like-minded investors.  I am inspired by other investors’ success and find the more experiences and knowledge that I share with others, the more confident I become.  

Thanks to all APIA event organizers and administrators for your brilliant work. 

Stella Shao

I like talking to people and learning from their experience because it gives me the confidence to invest well. I think it is a knowledge thing. I now know I am doing things the right way.

Stephen Weatherall

My APIA membership has become a total success.

Every time I attend a monthly or regional meeting I come away with so many useful and positive tips that have added value to my property investments and management.

Not only that, the website is a great place for practical advice and useful information. It has now evolved into an important resource for my business.

Talk about value for money! The discounts I have been getting at Bunnings when I present my APIA membership card have more than paid for my annual subscription!

Tim Duffett, Plan A Investments Limited