RSS Feed

Personal properties vs chattels

Tuesday, January 19, 2021

In an $11,476.87 order made against the tenant, Kieran Jie-Wei Cheng, that in part, penalised him for damaging the premises, the Tribunal clearly articulates the limits of its jurisdiction. In short, personal properties belonging to the landlord do not enjoy the same s49B protection against tenant damages as rental chattels otherwise would.


RE: Newman v Lalor and other parties [2021] NZTT Christchurch 4278015, 4282792

  • Mr Cheng along with others rented a property from and signed separate agreements with Mr Newman.
  • At the end of the tenancy, rent was owing, the property was substantially damaged and several chattels were either damaged or missing.
  • The landlord made his claims specifically against Mr Cheng.

Note: This digest is only concerned with claims relating to damages to and missing chattels and personal properties.

The law

The adjudicator outlines the general steps the Tribunal goes through to adjudge liability when it comes to damages to the premises made after 27 August 2019 (s49B):

  1. The landlord establishes that damage to the premises occurred during the tenancy and that it is more wear and tear.
  2. The tenant to prove that he did not carelessly or intentionally cause or permit the damage to avoid liability.
  3. If the tenant was careless and the damage is covered by the landlord’s insurance then the tenant is to pay the lesser of the insurance excess or four weeks’ rent.
  4. If the tenant was careless but the damage is not covered by the landlord’s insurance then the tenant is to pay the landlord four weeks’ rent.
  5. If the tenant intentionally caused the damage then he is liable for the cost of repair/replacement.

The rules of damages extend also to facilities/chattels (s49E). Facilities are specifically defined by the Act. For the purpose of this digest, they can be broadly understood as chattels that form part of the tenancy.



The landlord was successful with all the claims relating to chattels that were provided to the tenant’s use as part of the tenancy. However, the adjudicator declined to award any compensation for missing and damaged personal properties that were left at the premises stating that ‘… [they] were the landlord’s personal property and they were not chattels provided for the tenant’s use. They were not therefore part of the tenancy and the loss of and damage to the items is a personal issue between the landlord and Mr Cheng. The Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to adjudicate on such claims.

Though the adjudicator does not reference s49E, the section explicitly states that the provisions for tenant’s liability to damages are limited only to the premises and its facilities.


Take-home for landlords

It is not uncommon for landlords to store personal belongings at a rental property. And when these items are left at the premises in a way that makes them easily accessible to tenants, it is hardly surprising that, over time, tenants could confuse them with chattels that form part of the tenancy.

We recommend landlords to consider taking some or all of the following steps to preserve and protect personal properties left at the premises:

  1. That appropriate insurance be in place for these items and that landlords explore with their insurance companies ways to store and secure them;
  2. That the items be stored securely in areas that the tenant have no access to;
  3. That landlords clearly document and communicate with the tenant about any personal belongings that are not part of the tenancy;
  4. That tenants be given the opportunity to request that these items be either removed or give input as to the best ways for storage; and
  5. That every property inspection visit includes a stocktake of personal belongings left at the premises and any issues to be addressed as soon as they are discovered.


Overall helpfulness scale (Because let's be honest, Tribunal decisions can be a bit of a mess but still, landlords and tenants need all the help we can get!)
⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️


Recent Posts


landlord meth contamination rta reform clnz heat pump interest only nzpif education cat Case study property apprentice structure auckland boarding house Guest blog heating capital gain smoke alarm warren buffett property maintenance brightline meth sale and purchas winz trademe gluckman report privacy fixed-term tenancy anti-social behaviour Kris Pedersen Mortgages and Insurance bankruptcy financial advisers act insulation travel bubble buyer's agent inflation debt to income opes partners Landlording first home buying Investor story data security inspection heater rent arrears market rent ventilation early termination house prices rta shortland chartered accountants barfoot and thompson retaliatory notice letting Level 4 covid-19 principal and interest interest rates property cycle CoreLogic will warm up new zealand Must know quiet enjoyment scotney williams Editor's Choice short term rental positive cash flow speculator investor Holler HHGA election 2017 CCC Question and answer sale and purchase Property (Relationships) Act rent increase asbestos cgt holiday house insurance kiwibuild partners reserve bank trespass business letting fee parry v inglis watercare ocr apia tax housing package bad tenant Sponsored post productivity income HHS mortgage RTAA 2019 unitary plan tenancy issues rental market RBNZ tenant mindset recycling equity minor dwelling buying rules renovation bond form trust rental wof property management election2020 legal legal cost commerce commission rent off the plan property value robert kiyosaki extractor fan building shower dome maintenance television auckland council interest limitation Market report banking government equity termination rtaa2020 TCIT Gluckman daikin airbnb wins water bill subdivision housing affordability beginner investor worksafe debt enforcement Tribunal case study investment strategy market skill shortage p lab damage initio interest deductibility Standards New Zealand Q&A return buying tenancy tribunal lockdown khh wealth creation Zodiak Management property HSWA housing bubble Investment tip sublease lvr relationship twg report advice development short-term rental re agent Must knows ring-fencing Jeff Bezos ird rent control How to tenancy services negotiation management finance personal growth DTI cash-flow yield ask an expert anz LIM bond


Introducing Our Partners
Principal Sponsor - Kris Pedersen Mortgages & Insurance logo Gold Sponsor - Barfoot & Thompson logo Gold Sponsor - CoreLogic logo Property Apprentice logo The Insulation Warehouse logo The Renovation Team logo The New Zealand Property Investors' Federation logo