RSS Feed

Government signalling partial reversal of Holler v Osaki

Monday, October 17, 2016

For some months, the New Zealand Property Investors' Federation (the NZPIF), the Tenancy Tribunal and other key tenancy organisations have been in dialogue with the government as well as major party leaders to give feedback on how Holler v Osaki affects the landscape of residential tenancies in New Zealand.  Legitimate concerns have been raised by these groups that Holler has the effects of increasing costs, raising rent, encouraging profiling and discrimination, devolving tenant responsibility, increasing landlord intrusion and hampering the Tribunal's function to arbitrate tenancy disputes efficiently.   

Over the weekend at the New Zealand Property Investors' Federation annual Conference, Housing Minister Dr. Nick Smith announced the government's plan to change the Residential Tenancies Act in order to (partially) counter the effects of Holler v Osaki:

“This review has been prompted by recent court decisions and Tenancy Tribunal rulings, which have sparked confusion over how the Residential Tenancy Act (1986) and the Property Law Act (2007) interact. This is resulting in uncertainty for landlords and tenants, and is affecting the effective functioning of the Tenancy Tribunal.

“The issue is tenant damage to a property through carelessness or negligence. The latest court rulings mean landlords cannot recover the costs of this damage where they have insurance, including for their costs such as the excess. The problem with this approach is that it reduces the incentive for tenants to take good care of the property they rent. It also reduces the landlord’s incentive to have insurance as it lessens tenants’ responsibilities.

“My concern about this new interpretation is that it will add to the overall costs of the residential sector, driving up insurance costs and rents. However, we do not wish to return to the situation where tenants may be sued by their landlord’s insurance company for hundreds of thousands of dollars, such as with an accidental house fire.

“The proposal I am considering is that tenants would be liable for damage caused by carelessness or negligence up to the value of their landlord’s insurance excess but not exceeding four weeks’ rent, which is aligned with the standard tenancy bond. A different amount could be mutually agreed if specifically provided for in the tenancy agreement and would enable the tenant, if they wished, to take out their own insurance.

“The tenant would remain fully liable for damage caused intentionally or caused by a criminal act, with no limitation. The landlord would remain liable for fair wear and tear, and any damage caused to the property by an event beyond the tenant’s control, such as a storm or an earthquake.

“I have asked the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment to do targeted consultation with tenant and landlord organisations, and the insurance sector, on possible amendments. I am particularly interested in views on what is an appropriate limit on tenants’ liabilities.

“New Zealand has 450,000 tenanted properties, and both tenants and landlords need certainty about their rights and responsibilities. I am looking for a practical solution that will work for both tenants and landlords.”

While this is certainly good news for landlords, it is important to understand that there is still a lot of hard work to be done.  What is being proposed here are some broad and very raw ideas which may or may not develop into solutions that will improve the day-to-day running of your rental properties.  It is important that, through the NZPIF, we remain engaged with policymakers to maintain an element of commercial pragmatism so that a common sense outcome can be arrived at and we can all get back to the business of providing good quality accommodation services for our tenants.  

To better support the NZPIF and its ongoing efforts, we encourage you to share your thoughts on what is being proposed below: 

* Required



Not liable at all
Partially liable (up to the value of the landlord's insurance excess)
Partially liable (up to the value of four weeks rent)
Partially liable (up to an amount pre-agreed by the tenant and landlord)
Fully liable

Not liable at all
Partially liable (up to the value of four weeks rent)
Partially liable (up to an amount pre-agreed by the tenant and landlord)
Fully liable

No opinion


Recent Posts


auckland council Jeff Bezos tenancy issues renovation letting fee LIM anz lvr Market report off the plan sublease investor positive cash flow banking skill shortage Must knows winz ird meth contamination return CoreLogic finance advice wins shower dome initio structure Sponsored post bad tenant tax reserve bank robert kiyosaki building first home buying wealth creation Investor story warren buffett market rent capital gain auckland rta reform scotney williams Standards New Zealand development government debt enforcement smoke alarm water bill Must know cash-flow legal landlord Property (Relationships) Act asbestos property CCC gluckman report TCIT twg report beginner investor property management subdivision Landlording sale and purchas data security trust parry v inglis fixed-term tenancy maintenance privacy rent increase education rental wof Editor's Choice airbnb interest rates inspection property value property maintenance worksafe bond interest only ask an expert housing affordability tenancy tribunal HHGA investment strategy mortgage extractor fan cat tenancy services negotiation rent arrears insulation warm up new zealand bond form property cycle heater boarding house How to ring-fencing election 2017 market Holler DTI trademe housing bubble trespass p lab short-term rental Investment tip heating sale and purchase ocr HSWA partners clnz insurance HHS income rta equity relationship rent productivity damage ventilation Kris Pedersen Mortgages and Insurance principal and interest speculator Guest blog Question and answer minor dwelling holiday house tenant Q&A television rental market unitary plan buying buying rules letting house prices management watercare financial advisers act business cgt nzpif buyer's agent personal growth Tribunal case study


Introducing Our Partners
Principal Sponsor - Kris Pedersen Mortgages & Insurance logo Gold Sponsor - Barfoot & Thompson logo Gold Sponsor - CoreLogic logo Property Apprentice logo Keith Hay Homes logo The Insulation Warehouse logo The Renovation Team logo The New Zealand Property Investors' Federation logo
09 360 2376

The Tenancy Practice Service and TPS Credit Control work closely with the Auckland Property Investors' Association. Our vision of bringing helpful resources, documents and high quality services to Auckland Property Investors and Property Managers is shared by APIA, so its a partnership that works well. 

The Auckland Property Investors' Association is a great organisation for those who want access to advice and information from a range of industry experts and partners. 

Mathieu Holt- Managing Director, The Tenancy Practice Service & TPS Credit Control
Through the Association I found the channels and methods to fund the purchase of property I never dreamed about. Grant Brown

All round it has been one of those things Neil and I felt was really worthwhile belonging to. We have learned so much it has just built our confidence in what we are doing.

Janice Bieleski
I read two articles in the monthly magazine that saved me over $5,000. That is my membership fee for the next 26 years and I am sure I will learn a whole lot more! John Duncan
Fantastic organisation. The networking opportunities are brilliant and provide us with information and opportunities that cannot be obtained anywhere else. We learn something new at every meeting and we've been in this game for nearly 20 years. Pauline and Gyanen Kumar

I find the information obtained from various APIA meetings very useful in guiding my own property investment and rental management.  I also enjoy the networking opportunities with like-minded investors.  I am inspired by other investors’ success and find the more experiences and knowledge that I share with others, the more confident I become.  

Thanks to all APIA event organizers and administrators for your brilliant work. 

Stella Shao

I like talking to people and learning from their experience because it gives me the confidence to invest well. I think it is a knowledge thing. I now know I am doing things the right way.

Stephen Weatherall

My APIA membership has become a total success.

Every time I attend a monthly or regional meeting I come away with so many useful and positive tips that have added value to my property investments and management.

Not only that, the website is a great place for practical advice and useful information. It has now evolved into an important resource for my business.

Talk about value for money! The discounts I have been getting at Bunnings when I present my APIA membership card have more than paid for my annual subscription!

Tim Duffett, Plan A Investments Limited