RSS Feed

New bylaw may mean more than just removing the fireplace

Friday, October 31, 2014

News of the Auckland Council's proposed air quality bylaw has understandably unsettled landlords who own properties that are heated by indoor wood/coal burners.  This week's Ask An Expert feature explores the possible legal implications this bylaw has within the framework of the Residential Tenancies Act: 

APIA Ask An Expert

Regarding the proposed bylaw to phase out pre-2005 indoor open fire burners, if it is passed would that introduce any RTA obligations for landlords for rent out properties with indoor open fire burners as the main heat source?  Would landlords be required to replace this 'amenity' for existing tenancies and if so, what with? 

APIA Ask An Expert

If the Council should require all pre-2005 fireplaces to be removed or permanently disabled, it is very likely that the Tenancy Tribunal would order a substitute appliance be installed. 

There have been some decisions of the Tenancy Tribunal in the South Island where the old "burners" were made illegal and had to be removed or replaced.  The Tenancy Tribunal has on occasion ordered that they be replaced.  This is likely to be where an old wood burner or similar was rendered legal and the tenant requested it be removed and a substitute wood burner be installed.  This does not necessarily mean that the Tenancy Tribunal would order a replacement "like for like" in every case but it certainly could do so if it felt it necessary.  There may be good reason for such a decision such as plentiful supply of free firewood.  

The Housing Improvement regulations 1947 are the authority for the minimum standards of fitness for houses.  Regulation 5(a) requires all houses to have a "living room" and Regulation 6 requires "[e]very living room shall be fitted with a fireplace and chimney or other approved form of heating"/ 

It follows that while the Tenancy Tribunal could order a heating device be installed where the tenant made application for one, it is just as likely that the landlord could offer an "approved" alternative which I am confident would be an acceptable solution.  The Tribunal would be mindful of the landlords cost of installation, the effectiveness of the unit, in the context of the house and the ongoing cost to the tenant.  

In today's world, heat pumps have proven a cost effective solution.  If the worst should happen, landlords would be wise to plan well in advance, to offer some other alternative rather than just hope for the best.  

Scotney Williams
Craeg is a principal of Tenancy Practice Service, a tenancy consulting firm which advises major property management brands.  Scotney and his team are also involved in providing support for private landlords by way of training seminars, best practice protocols, drafting applications, advice about re-hearing and appeals, tenancy debt collection as well as human rights and privacy issues.  

Do you have any property related questions for our panel of experts?  Comment below or email us at [email protected].  

Recent Posts


asbestos cgt debt to income interest limitation house prices clnz watercare insurance relationship minor dwelling buyer's agent nzpif khh market smoke alarm damage television property maintenance HHS trademe landlord twg report banking off the plan RTAA 2019 commerce commission warm up new zealand principal and interest bond Landlording worksafe anti-social behaviour sublease productivity rental wof beginner investor HHGA rent increase property management ask an expert yield Gluckman maintenance election 2017 auckland council inflation short term rental anz buying rules housing bubble letting LIM Guest blog mindset warren buffett development Must knows opes partners auckland tenancy issues equity fixed-term tenancy heating daikin winz cash-flow covid-19 How to initio CoreLogic apia privacy property cycle heater election2020 trespass boarding house Jeff Bezos legal kiwibuild robert kiyosaki Tribunal case study Question and answer housing package advice will debt enforcement return heat pump ird interest only unitary plan speculator travel bubble business ring-fencing water bill trust brightline management Level 4 early termination property barfoot and thompson Market report financial advisers act Keith Hay Homes personal growth rent arrears gluckman report market rent extractor fan renovation bankruptcy investor rtaa2020 sale and purchase property apprentice Property (Relationships) Act meth wins housing affordability Investor story Kris Pedersen Mortgages and Insurance lockdown subdivision insulation cat data security meth contamination Editor's Choice scotney williams RBNZ wealth creation Investment tip holiday house quiet enjoyment bond form rent partners income p lab parry v inglis termination tenancy services letting fee inspection airbnb rta CCC Standards New Zealand ventilation rent control short-term rental sale and purchas skill shortage Must know education government HSWA lvr shower dome bad tenant tenant rental market reserve bank tenancy tribunal DTI first home buying finance capital gain tax rta reform negotiation legal cost interest rates buying investment strategy Sponsored post Holler property value ocr Q&A recycling equity shortland chartered accountants re agent TCIT building mortgage positive cash flow structure retaliatory notice interest deductibility Case study Zodiak Management


Introducing Our Partners
Principal Sponsor - Kris Pedersen Mortgages & Insurance logo Gold Sponsor - Barfoot & Thompson logo Gold Sponsor - CoreLogic logo Property Apprentice logo The Insulation Warehouse logo The Renovation Team logo The New Zealand Property Investors' Federation logo