APIA Blog

RSS Feed

Landlords would do well not to underestimate the RTA

Wednesday, February 03, 2021

Mainstream commentary on the Residential Tenancies Amendment Act 2020 (RTAA 2020) is grossly preoccupied with the removal of the 90-day no-fault termination notice. At times, it even exaggerates the (detrimental) consequences landlords will be made to suffer post 11 February seeing as the proverbial rug is about to be pulled out from under us.

We disagree and offer this reframe - That while the 90-day no-fault termination notice is the easiest ‘catch-all’ solution for landlords to move along problematic tenants, it is not the only one. To describe its removal as the clipping of landlords’ wings would be an injustice to the Residential Tenancies Act (RTA) and the full set of tools it has available for landlords to manage our tenancies. Our hope and expectation are that landlords will come to appreciate the RTA’s legal apparatus in its entirety and see that there are still ample ways to preserve our rights as property owners.

S56 termination

An example is an s56 application for termination (for non-payment of rent and other breaches) which is not subject to RTAA 2020 amendments. The section itself is nothing new. After all, it is the legal authority for 14-day notices. The other aspect of s56 that does not get talked about nearly enough is that failure by the offending party to remedy the breach within the notice period could give the aggrieved party the ability to apply to the Tribunal for termination. And this mechanism could very well capture most of the situations that would, prior to 11 February 2021, warrant and result in a 90-day notice.

Say you have a tenant who persistently disturbs the peace in the neighbourhood but the behaviour never amounts to the statutory standard for anti-social behaviour. The three-strike rule isn’t going to help you there (especially when the tenant is entitled to challenge your allegation). But, disturbing neighbours is a breach of s40(2)(c) that warrants an s56 notice. If the tenant does not rein in her behaviour within the 14-days or if her behaviour is in such a way that you do not believe the breach could be remedied then you can make an application to the Tribunal for termination. If the Tribunal considers it fair and just for the tenancy to be terminated, it would do so in your favour. Indeed, the Tribunal is known for ordering an s56 termination for a variety of behaviours such as rent arrears, meth consumption, failure to upkeep, disturbing neighbours, abusing/harassing contractors and similar such.

S55B termination

Another instrument that could provide landlords with some much-needed assurance is the soon to be s55B. Landlords (not tenants) will have the ability to apply to the Tribunal for termination citing hardship. We won’t know much about how the section will be interpreted and applied until the amendments bed in and cases are brought forth for adjudication. However, on the face of it, it certainly looks hopeful for those landlords seeking to be released from an unduly onerous tenancy.

Inconvenience ≠ hopelessness

Keen-eyed readers out there would point out that termination by application is not the same as a termination by notice; that the alternatives proposed here are not like-for-like replacements for the 90-day notice. And you would be right.

In saying that, something that is inconvenient is not straightaway hopeless. Removing the 90-day notice makes termination inconvenient for landlords but not impossible. If renting is to be accepted as a business like any other then landlords shouldn’t cower from pro-consumer principles that underwrite the business zeitgeist. Most of us had been tenants before and can surely see the value of having a rental relationship that is built on transparency and certainty. If we care to cast aside our immediate concerns about the amendments, we will hopefully see the RTAA 2020 as a call to action to elevate our professionalism, broaden our understanding of the law, allow knowledge to empower our actions and have faith that the system will still facilitate an equitable outcome as long as our reasons and actions are just.

So keep that head up. 11th February is not Doomsday. It is merely a day on the calendar.

 


Recent Posts


Tags

inflation interest limitation data security heater property maintenance opes partners maintenance brightline finance cash-flow legal scotney williams ocr positive cash flow anz ask an expert personal growth termination income Editor's Choice quiet enjoyment fixed-term tenancy Guest blog interest only negotiation anti-social behaviour clnz wealth creation ring-fencing housing bubble minor dwelling trust tenancy issues trespass will recycling equity covid-19 government investment strategy equity speculator retaliatory notice Case study Investor story insurance yield rta tenancy services re agent meth property apprentice property management Jeff Bezos kiwibuild short-term rental mindset daikin initio insulation banking cat bankruptcy Q&A advice shower dome bond form shortland chartered accountants extractor fan damage rent increase skill shortage interest deductibility Kris Pedersen Mortgages and Insurance LIM debt enforcement heating apia winz heat pump bad tenant rent control rental wof tax Sponsored post unitary plan auckland council property Investment tip worksafe airbnb ird buyer's agent investor Keith Hay Homes Holler interest rates development watercare sale and purchas tenancy tribunal wins sale and purchase education Zodiak Management rental market Gluckman return water bill lockdown twg report travel bubble khh renovation housing package off the plan debt to income commerce commission RBNZ auckland subdivision TCIT nzpif Tribunal case study HHS rta reform buying rules Must knows CoreLogic lvr trademe boarding house rtaa2020 cgt business tenant HSWA election2020 legal cost election 2017 early termination How to p lab Must know DTI sublease building Question and answer partners rent management television RTAA 2019 HHGA Market report Level 4 capital gain mortgage privacy structure asbestos housing affordability reserve bank market rent barfoot and thompson warm up new zealand Standards New Zealand inspection property cycle productivity house prices smoke alarm meth contamination short term rental warren buffett property value CCC gluckman report buying financial advisers act robert kiyosaki letting beginner investor first home buying Landlording relationship rent arrears letting fee parry v inglis ventilation bond Property (Relationships) Act principal and interest holiday house landlord market

Archive

Introducing Our Partners
Principal Sponsor - Kris Pedersen Mortgages & Insurance logo Gold Sponsor - Barfoot & Thompson logo Gold Sponsor - CoreLogic logo Property Apprentice logo The Insulation Warehouse logo The Renovation Team logo The New Zealand Property Investors' Federation logo