RSS Feed

Amanda Watt: Removal of negative gearing

Thursday, June 07, 2018

I have delayed writing about the removal of the negative gearing, so I could spend more time thinking about what it will mean for property investors.

The Government’s issues paper addressing negative gearing came out earlier this year and asked for submissions. Both the NZPIF and APIA made submissions on behalf of members. 

The proposal outlined in the issues paper is that negative gearing will cease from the 2019/2020 year onwards. In brief, this means a residential property investor will not be able to offset losses from rental property against other income, such as their salary. The issues paper suggests this will either come in in one year or could be brought in over two to three years. The five-year time frame promised by Labour in the lead up to the election has been removed.

There have been some strong opinions on this; with some people saying it is ridiculous to remove negative gearing, while others say the proposal does not go far enough and that we should stop allowing deductibility of interest as an expense (don’t get me started on that!).

To illustrate the impact of removing negative gearing I thought I would give an example from my own experience. My first property investment initially made a loss. The interest rates were a lot higher, there were some maintenance issues and being a new investor I made some wrong decisions around tenant selection. The property made a loss but I offset it against my other income and received a refund. Let’s just use round numbers; I made a $1000 loss and received $330 back as a tax refund, so I was down only $670. Over the years, the mortgage has been repaid, the rent has more than doubled and it now makes a profit, roughly equivalent to the National Superannuation – which weirdly had been my original goal. I now pay tax on the income from this property.

Should we be concerned about the removal of negative gearing? The effect of the change is that if a property (or property portfolio) makes a loss, it cannot be offset against income from other sources in that year. Ultimately though the losses are carried forward and can be offset against profits when the property does start making money. Over time the IRD should collect no more tax from removing negative gearing if the property ends up making a profit – it is more a matter of money now or money later.

If I set up a small business at home and this made a loss I would be able to offset this against my other income and receive a refund as a result. I am not sure why this should be any different for a property investment.

The effect on cash flow, of course, will affect new investors more than established investors whose properties are already profitable. It also may restrict what investors are able to spend on maintenance. I recently have completed the accounts for my own properties for the last financial year. I spent a bit of time analysing the numbers. One of my largest costs over the portfolio is repairs and maintenance. A lot of things went wrong this year, but from a financial point of view, we were able to do a lot of the work. It averaged around $3000 per property; from plumbing and electrical to repairing storm damage. (Regarding the storm damage, although I believed I had full cover the insurance company paid out only about a third of our costs. My husband said it was “after the trickery of the insurance company”!)

Much of the maintenance work we did was preventative while some of it was in response to tenant requests. Currently, if I made a loss on the property investments by doing such maintenance and repairs I would be able to claim this against my other income for the year. But, in the same circumstances after the 2020 year, I would have to carry the loss forward. My concern is that for some landlords this may mean the difference between doing or not doing maintenance if there is no immediate tax relief. They might have to postpone the repairs until another year, increasing the risk that the property will deteriorate and that vacancies might result.

I have never been a fan of buying rental property such that it makes a loss and you need the tax refund just to survive. I believe this is fraught with danger, especially if you face unexpected expenses or vacancies. Losing the ability to negatively gear will mean many landlords will not have a tax refund to assist them to upgrade or maintain the property or simply repay debt.

Ultimately investors are going to need to have a reserve fund, so in the years that they make losses, this fund will carry them through. We have now one year to ensure our properties provide sufficient cash flow for the 2019/2020 year onwards, so any unexpected maintenance does not end up costing us even more.


This is a guest blog contribution from APIA board member Amanda Watt with minimal edits by John Priest. Guest blogs are a way for APIA members to share their views and experiences with each other and do not necessarily reflect the views and position of the APIA. Matters covered in this article are intended as general information only. We recommend you to seek professional advice to navigate these tax changes when appropriate. 


Amanda Watt 

Amanda has been an active property investor for over 15 years. She is also a Chartered Accountant and Director of Shortland Chartered Accountants Ltd. Amanda sits on the boards of the APIA as well as the NZPIF and is an active presenter in the property industry. You can reach Amanda at Shortland CA on 09 890 9840. 



Recent Posts


reserve bank ird personal growth building ring-fencing ask an expert trademe Sponsored post Property (Relationships) Act sale and purchase insurance Must know tenancy services cgt ventilation rental wof airbnb property twg report meth contamination CoreLogic education financial advisers act business asbestos debt enforcement Investment tip buying TCIT rent arrears wealth creation management election 2017 finance housing affordability rta reform structure rental market maintenance minor dwelling interest only Tribunal case study property cycle investment strategy legal ocr negotiation tenancy issues Jeff Bezos wins letting fee sublease warren buffett clnz tax income renovation HHS holiday house auckland council nzpif banking anz relationship Guest blog partners property value fixed-term tenancy Holler heating landlord warm up new zealand first home buying auckland beginner investor rent increase initio house prices property maintenance equity short-term rental cat Landlording rent capital gain housing bubble HHGA market rent heater damage parry v inglis lvr return Editor's Choice bond form boarding house mortgage Question and answer Investor story tenancy tribunal speculator scotney williams How to subdivision buyer's agent extractor fan sale and purchas investor buying rules property management television unitary plan Market report CCC Standards New Zealand tenant data security advice watercare worksafe winz trust HSWA bad tenant inspection letting Must knows bond p lab principal and interest rta robert kiyosaki development skill shortage water bill productivity trespass Q&A smoke alarm market gluckman report Kris Pedersen Mortgages and Insurance government shower dome cash-flow DTI LIM positive cash flow interest rates insulation privacy off the plan


Introducing Our Partners
Principal Sponsor - Kris Pedersen Mortgages & Insurance logo Gold Sponsor - Barfoot & Thompson logo Gold Sponsor - CoreLogic logo Property Apprentice logo Keith Hay Homes logo The Insulation Warehouse logo The Renovation Team logo The New Zealand Property Investors' Federation logo
09 360 2376

The Tenancy Practice Service and TPS Credit Control work closely with the Auckland Property Investors' Association. Our vision of bringing helpful resources, documents and high quality services to Auckland Property Investors and Property Managers is shared by APIA, so its a partnership that works well. 

The Auckland Property Investors' Association is a great organisation for those who want access to advice and information from a range of industry experts and partners. 

Mathieu Holt- Managing Director, The Tenancy Practice Service & TPS Credit Control
Through the Association I found the channels and methods to fund the purchase of property I never dreamed about. Grant Brown

All round it has been one of those things Neil and I felt was really worthwhile belonging to. We have learned so much it has just built our confidence in what we are doing.

Janice Bieleski
I read two articles in the monthly magazine that saved me over $5,000. That is my membership fee for the next 26 years and I am sure I will learn a whole lot more! John Duncan
Fantastic organisation. The networking opportunities are brilliant and provide us with information and opportunities that cannot be obtained anywhere else. We learn something new at every meeting and we've been in this game for nearly 20 years. Pauline and Gyanen Kumar

I find the information obtained from various APIA meetings very useful in guiding my own property investment and rental management.  I also enjoy the networking opportunities with like-minded investors.  I am inspired by other investors’ success and find the more experiences and knowledge that I share with others, the more confident I become.  

Thanks to all APIA event organizers and administrators for your brilliant work. 

Stella Shao

I like talking to people and learning from their experience because it gives me the confidence to invest well. I think it is a knowledge thing. I now know I am doing things the right way.

Stephen Weatherall

My APIA membership has become a total success.

Every time I attend a monthly or regional meeting I come away with so many useful and positive tips that have added value to my property investments and management.

Not only that, the website is a great place for practical advice and useful information. It has now evolved into an important resource for my business.

Talk about value for money! The discounts I have been getting at Bunnings when I present my APIA membership card have more than paid for my annual subscription!

Tim Duffett, Plan A Investments Limited