APIA Blog

RSS Feed

Affidavits and witness testimony necessary to substantiate an anti-social behaviour claim

Thursday, October 22, 2020

 

RE early termination for severe hardship on account of the tenant’s persistent anti-social behaviour

Landlords should not presume to be able to rely on letters or unsworn statements to substantiate an anti-social claim.

Background in brief

The tenancy in question is a single occupant fixed term tenancy at an Auckland CBD apartment. The building is controlled by a body corporate and employs a building manager. Over a period of 2 months, the tenant engaged in at least 6 separate instances of anti-social behaviour. And though the anti-social provisions under the RTAA2020 are not yet in effect, the behaviours are such that the landlord considers himself as being made to suffer severe and undue hardship should the tenancy be allowed to continue.

The landlord (an APIA member) applied to the Tribunal for early termination and attached a letter from the building manager evidencing the seriousness and scope of the tenant’s behaviour.

The adjudicator dismissed the letter outright telling the landlord that an application for early termination is so against the interests of the respondent that for it to be successful, a witness must attend to attest to the anti-social behaviour and be subject to reasonable questioning. She followed through with her rebuke by suggesting that the letter could have been fabricated. It was not.

The issue that concerns APIA and future applicants

Witness testimonies are not common at Tribunal hearings, at least not in the numerous orders we’ve reviewed over the years. Though on the Tribunal’s website applicants are encouraged to submit written evidence such as tenancy agreement, rent summary, 14-day notices, correspondences, tradesperson quotes, bank statements/accounts, inspection reports, rent book, photos and letters, this latest happening would suggest a shift in the Tribunal's norms and standards requiring (or at least favouring) witness participating before making an order for early termination.

This will have huge implication for landlords seeking relief under the anti-social provisions once they come into effect in February 2021. It would seem that a letter from affected parties such as the neighbour would not reach the high evidentiary watermark that is likely to be imposed by the Tribunal.

Note that APIA is at the moment awaiting confirmation from the Tribunal for any specific requirements or at least best practice guidelines for landlords seeking to make an anti-social termination application. We will share the information with our members once it is available.

Best practice suggestion

In the meantime, the Ministry of Justice recommends the following:

  • Understand that applications for a termination order are considered far more serious than most other claims and thus require the applicant to furnish a higher standard of proof (though irrespective of which, the civil standard of proof remains that of on the balance of probabilities);
  • The preference is always to have a witness attending to support your claim and be subject to reasonable questioning by the adjudicator;
  • Understanding that most people at the receiving end of your tenant’s anti-social behaviour would be reluctant to attend, the next best option is to have the witness swear an affidavit rather than submit a letter or unsworn statement. Click here for more information on an affidavit. A general affidavit template can be downloaded here
  • In the worst possible scenario, you can ask the MOJ to issue a witness summons compelling the witness to attend.  From February 2021, failure to answer a witness summons will attract a $3,600 fine.

While this development is certainly less than satisfactory and further diminishes the intended expediency of the Tribunal process, we feel that it is important to share this information nevertheless to help you better protect yourself against anti-social tenants. 

 

 


Recent Posts


Tags

apia tenant advice development building debt enforcement banking partners cgt rta first home buying maintenance skill shortage RBNZ Editor's Choice scotney williams beginner investor business interest deductibility interest only property maintenance financial advisers act barfoot and thompson bond form worksafe property apprentice unitary plan RTAA 2019 HSWA fixed-term tenancy wealth creation reserve bank Jeff Bezos lvr re agent housing package airbnb HHS HHGA buyer's agent interest rates trespass privacy Question and answer ird robert kiyosaki cash-flow Sponsored post negotiation Zodiak Management CCC principal and interest trust positive cash flow Guest blog relationship interest limitation Level 4 housing bubble parry v inglis rent increase Kris Pedersen Mortgages and Insurance bond DTI structure initio p lab ventilation rent control tax government property personal growth TCIT property cycle opes partners heater Market report capital gain finance yield education sale and purchase CoreLogic meth contamination wins house prices mortgage election 2017 nzpif Case study equity tenancy services debt to income covid-19 inspection heating rtaa2020 warm up new zealand LIM rent arrears buying rules insurance legal recycling equity legal cost shortland chartered accountants heat pump investor Must knows sublease subdivision data security rental wof letting speculator commerce commission Must know gluckman report anti-social behaviour income damage Standards New Zealand Q&A landlord productivity sale and purchas watercare management ring-fencing Investment tip short term rental tenancy tribunal khh minor dwelling market kiwibuild will market rent twg report cat property management extractor fan How to bad tenant smoke alarm letting fee daikin election2020 tenancy issues boarding house meth termination investment strategy bankruptcy brightline rental market retaliatory notice early termination rta reform Holler asbestos insulation trademe travel bubble winz ask an expert quiet enjoyment return off the plan buying Investor story holiday house auckland short-term rental Tribunal case study water bill rent anz Property (Relationships) Act shower dome auckland council clnz warren buffett housing affordability renovation property value mindset Landlording Gluckman television ocr

Archive

Introducing Our Partners
Principal Sponsor - Kris Pedersen Mortgages & Insurance logo Gold Sponsor - Barfoot & Thompson logo Gold Sponsor - CoreLogic logo Property Apprentice logo The Insulation Warehouse logo The Renovation Team logo The New Zealand Property Investors' Federation logo