RSS Feed

Could this be the start to the end of FM Custodian?

Tuesday, October 31, 2017

The landlord industry has been rocked, in recent months, by the effects of the High Court's decision of Anderson v FM Custodians Ltd [2013] NZHC 2423.  Specifically, the case has been cited as authority for tenants to claw back 100% of all rents paid throughout the time of tenancy at the point of dispute.  It doesn't take much to acknowledge the gross injustice in most cases where landlords are not recompensated at all for granting the benefits of exclusive possession to tenants.  Still, if the recent Tenancy Tribunal order of Edwards, Bethani vs Wongeoon Vast Limited is anything to go by, it appears that all is not lost. 

1. Background 

Much had been written about Anderson and are widely available on the internet.  A good breakdown of the effects it has on residential tenancy can be found here.  For the purpose of this discussion, it is sufficient to point out that Anderson has determined that unconsented premises are not captured by the definition of 'residential premises' under the Residential Tenancies Act ("RTA").  Concerned properties, therefore, fall outside of the RTA and are beyond the reach of the Tenancy Tribunal.  The effect is such that the Tribunal itself has no jurisdiction to determine claims deriving from the unconsented/unlawful nature of the property.  That all sounded like an exercise in academic hair-splitting until Parry, Natalie Michelle vs Inglis, Vic came to popular attention.  The adjudicator in Parry, citing Anderson as precedent, determined that the tenant was entitled to claw back all the rents paid during the tenancy without considering the landlord's counterclaim.  In the end, Mr. Parry had to sell his rental property in order to satisfy the order.  It is worthwhile to note that this case is currently under appeal and will be heard at the District Court. 

We are somewhat unsurprised to hear, anecdotally, that there has been an increasing number of inquiries into property files at council level as well as clawback claims at the Tribunal level.  Until the RTA Amendments take effect and further lobbying results can be achieved, landlords are operating in a quasi-limbo space characterised by uncertainty and increasing vulnerability.

2. Practical effect of Anderson and Parry

A policy-based argument is often made that the landlord bears a degree of responsibility for his tenant's health and safety through the quality of housing provided.  This is a position organisations like ours have always wholeheartedly embraced.  Indeed, legislation should be passed to drive out slumlords and those who are profiteering off tenants living in unsafe, unhealthy, and unsanitary environments.  

But the combined effects of Anderson and Parry, or at least how they are being commonly utilised right at this moment, do not speak to the preservation of tenants' health and wellbeing at all.  In many cases, the two precedents are cited as basis for tenants to claw back all the rents paid during the tenancy irrespective of being negatively impacted by the property itself.  To landlords, the current state of affairs is substantially unjust.  Policy-wise, it is also unsustainable to allow a system where tenants enjoy the benefits of accommodation without any cost.  

3. Edwards, Bethani vs Wongeoon Vast Limited 

Edwards is one such post-Anderson-Parry clawback claim.  We are encouraged to see the adjudicator denying the claim on the following basis: 

  • That an analogous common-law scenario of a lease that is granted for a property that cannot be lawfully occupied by the tenant does not invalidate the lease itself, nor does it entitle the tenant to recover any rent paid.  The correct treatment is for the unlawful nature of the property to be treated as a breach tenant's right (of quiet enjoyment) and the legal remedies must flow from that breach; 
  • It is difficult to accept that Parliament, in drafting s137 of the RTA, had intended the Tribunal to allow rent clawback in every case of unlawful property as it would be a 'crude, all or nothing and disproportionate response in many cases'.  
Landlords will undoubtedly find Edwards a welcoming relief, for the time being.  There are likely to be more cases and appeals which will have the effect of further clarifying the law.  For the time being, we will continue to support the lobbying efforts of our national affiliate, The New Zealand Property Investors' Federation, to affect a more commonsense outcome. 

Recent Posts


Standards New Zealand equity finance positive cash flow wealth creation capital gain DTI property value Q&A insulation property cycle renovation meth contamination RBNZ partners tenant structure damage fixed-term tenancy Kris Pedersen Mortgages and Insurance rent clnz buyer's agent principal and interest data security tenancy issues property management Gluckman auckland rta market letting fee tenancy tribunal property beginner investor income sublease heating ask an expert airbnb p lab Landlording gluckman report tenancy services legal wins buying rules termination ird Question and answer warm up new zealand inspection asbestos buying Editor's Choice warren buffett bond relationship privacy off the plan business rta reform HSWA maintenance sale and purchas Guest blog debt enforcement productivity ventilation development water bill rental wof HHGA government advice Property (Relationships) Act shower dome smoke alarm bond form Holler initio investor minor dwelling reserve bank TCIT RTAA 2019 housing bubble nzpif extractor fan How to cgt trust rent increase interest rates anz speculator interest only Jeff Bezos lvr Investment tip first home buying Market report HHS scotney williams short-term rental negotiation skill shortage holiday house insurance building cash-flow LIM investment strategy tax banking landlord mortgage television education return Sponsored post trademe housing affordability unitary plan parry v inglis meth subdivision Tribunal case study watercare Must know management sale and purchase property maintenance CCC Must knows rental market bad tenant robert kiyosaki rent arrears trespass ring-fencing heater election 2017 worksafe boarding house personal growth financial advisers act market rent ocr winz Investor story twg report cat letting auckland council CoreLogic house prices


Introducing Our Partners
Principal Sponsor - Kris Pedersen Mortgages & Insurance logo Gold Sponsor - Barfoot & Thompson logo Gold Sponsor - CoreLogic logo Property Apprentice logo The Insulation Warehouse logo The Renovation Team logo The New Zealand Property Investors' Federation logo
09 360 2376

The Tenancy Practice Service and TPS Credit Control work closely with the Auckland Property Investors' Association. Our vision of bringing helpful resources, documents and high quality services to Auckland Property Investors and Property Managers is shared by APIA, so its a partnership that works well. 

The Auckland Property Investors' Association is a great organisation for those who want access to advice and information from a range of industry experts and partners. 

Mathieu Holt- Managing Director, The Tenancy Practice Service & TPS Credit Control
Through the Association I found the channels and methods to fund the purchase of property I never dreamed about. Grant Brown

All round it has been one of those things Neil and I felt was really worthwhile belonging to. We have learned so much it has just built our confidence in what we are doing.

Janice Bieleski
I read two articles in the monthly magazine that saved me over $5,000. That is my membership fee for the next 26 years and I am sure I will learn a whole lot more! John Duncan
Fantastic organisation. The networking opportunities are brilliant and provide us with information and opportunities that cannot be obtained anywhere else. We learn something new at every meeting and we've been in this game for nearly 20 years. Pauline and Gyanen Kumar

I find the information obtained from various APIA meetings very useful in guiding my own property investment and rental management.  I also enjoy the networking opportunities with like-minded investors.  I am inspired by other investors’ success and find the more experiences and knowledge that I share with others, the more confident I become.  

Thanks to all APIA event organizers and administrators for your brilliant work. 

Stella Shao

I like talking to people and learning from their experience because it gives me the confidence to invest well. I think it is a knowledge thing. I now know I am doing things the right way.

Stephen Weatherall

My APIA membership has become a total success.

Every time I attend a monthly or regional meeting I come away with so many useful and positive tips that have added value to my property investments and management.

Not only that, the website is a great place for practical advice and useful information. It has now evolved into an important resource for my business.

Talk about value for money! The discounts I have been getting at Bunnings when I present my APIA membership card have more than paid for my annual subscription!

Tim Duffett, Plan A Investments Limited